Blue Velvet | Varied Celluloid

Blue Velvet

Posted by Josh Samford On March - 19 - 2010
The Plot: Jeffrey Beaumont (Kyle Maclachlan) is a fresh faced young man back in his home town of Lumberton after his father falls ill and is spending some time in the hospital. While strolling, on one of his regular visits to his father, he stumbles upon a severed human ear just sitting in the forest. He takes the severed appendage to the local police and they assure him that they will get right on top of the situation. When Jeffrey decides to follow up on the ear, by visiting the Sheriff in his own home, he meets his lovely daughter Sandy (Laura Dern) who clues Jeffrey into the gossip about local singer Dorothy Vallens (Issabella Rossellini) who appears to be mixed up in some rather dark situations. Jeffrey eventually sneaks into Dorothy’s apartment and discovers her situation is more sinister than anyone could have envisioned. She has a husband and a son who are both being held hostage by the psychotic gangster Frank Booth (Dennis Hopper) who uses her for sexual purposes. As Jeffrey slowly delves further into this world of dark forces, he slowly loses his grip on the sunny and peaceful Lumberton that he grew up with.





The Review
I originally had a review written for Blue Velvet back when this site first opened its doors in 2003, but I actually put it on the side as my writing just wasn’t up the standards that I think the film ultimately deserves. Truthfully, I think the content was a bit over my ability to grasp and put into words. Truthfully, it probably still is. After another recent viewing of the film though,I feel compelled to discuss it. David Lynch is a filmmaker that demands a lot from his viewers. He asks for your patience, he asks you to be open minded and in some cases he asks you for your sanity so that he can dispose of it. Blue Velvet came off the heels of Dune, a project that Lynch still feels a pretty sore about to this day, and reflects his attempt at creating a piece of art while also paying more heed to the general laws of cinematic technique than he would in later years. While not conventional in the least, just by comparison you might think that Blue Velvet is a more toned down work, but just as in the movie, things are not as they seem.

The opening sequence, aside from being absolutely brilliant in its simplicity it’s also very important to understanding the film. It essentially tells us everything there is to know about Blue Velvet and the ideas it looks to convey. Lynch starts things off by showing off the town of Lumberton, where the film takes place, with its series of white picket fences and the serene landscape where a fireman waves at us from the side of his fire truck. We see a man watering his flowers with a hose, his dog hovering in the background, but as we draw closer the man grabs at his head and falls to the ground. The audio becomes a sound-scape of odd pitches and noises, as the dog bites at the water firing from the water hose. The camera then zooms into the wet grass, where we discover that underneath this serene image lies a cavalcade of insects. A chaotic scene of violence, as we see these beings all fighting and snapping. All of this beneath the dull scenery. From there David Lynch expounds on this allegory and takes it into different and perverse directions, exploring the human existence and ultimately making one of the best films of his career.

Blue Velvet is a film that deals in slow revelations. Following in the foot steps of that opening shot, the entire movie could be seen as a larger version of the same metaphor. When we first meet Jeffrey Beaumont, he’s tossing rocks while walking through a country shortcut. He is the perfect snapshot of Americana. Tall, dark, handsome and full of boyhood naivete. When he discovers the dismembered ear, just lying in the dirt, it’s a confrontation for him unlike anything he’s ever faced up close and personal. I enjoy these early scenes with Jeffrey more as I’ve grown as a viewer, because I see now what Lynch was doing. Generally, in the first thirty minutes of the film – everything seems a bit ‘off”. The performances come across as shelled and lacking in emotion, stilted even. There’s a scene where Jeffrey brings the ear he has found to the sheriff who simply looks at the piece of flesh and comments “Yes. That’s an ear.” without the slightest bit of hesitation or surprise in his voice. This is a bizarre Ozzie & Harriet style universe that we’re introduced to early on in the film, but as we root along through the underbelly of this city – things become more realistic the darker things get; presenting the abnormality and falsehood that the pleasant and wholesome outer surface of Lumberton truly is.

Blue Velvet is ultimately a film about themes, dealing with the faces we hide from the public and there’s certainly some commentary within about repressed sexuality and desires. That is actually one aspect up until this point I haven’t talked about, as the sexuality in my opinion is needlessly considered “controversial”. Roger Ebert was actually very offended in his initial review for the film upon its release, saying that Isabella Rossellini was exploited and brandished about with no decent reasoning. I could not possibly disagree more and I’d like to hope that Roger has changed his mind on the film at this point, seeing just the type of filmmaker that David Lynch has went on to become. Truthfully, if you’ve ever seen a naked woman or a man before, then there’s really nothing that shocking within Blue Velvet. The sex isn’t graphic and generally the violence isn’t either, but it most certainly is cold and rather disturbing. Much like the mad man that is Frank Booth.

Really, you have to comment on Dennis Hopper’s performance here. The character of Frank Booth is not three dimensional or well rounded, but what he lacks in emotional depth he more than makes up for in explosiveness. When Hopper steps in a scene, the screen is blown apart by violence. He tears the film apart with his manic presence, bringing chaos to every scene he is in. Every conversation the character has is awkward and ultimately ends with him shouting or going insane, before taking a deep inhalation from his oxygen mask. What is he inhaling? I have no idea, but it doesn’t really matter. It’s just another one of these perverse elements that bring us the creature that is Frank Booth. The rest of the cast are all equally great in their roles, especially Rossellini, who manages to not be overshadowed by the insanity that Hopper delivers.

The Trivia
  • Robert Loggia, who later went on to play another one of David Lynch’s psychotic creations “Mr. Eddy” in Lost Highway, was originally very interested in playing the role of Frank.

  • Made in the wake of Dune, which showed David Lynch being forced into a more commercial setting, Blue Velvet would turn out to be a controversial and divisive film that split critics and had to be distributed by a secondary company created by Dino De Laurentis.

  • The role of Frank was originally offered to Harry Dean Stanton, an actor that Lynch would subsequently work with on frequent occasions.


  • The Conclusion
    There’s really not a whole lot that I can say about Blue Velvet that hasn’t been said before, in much better terms, but if my opinion means anything of consequence to you as a reader take this bit of advice into consideration when watching: observe everything. When Lynch is at his best creatively, he makes films that get better upon subsequent viewings and Blue Velvet is certainly such an example. For those of you who haven’t seen it, it’s a divisive film to say the least but if you have the patience and you are of the right temperment; it can deliver so much to the viewer. It gets my highest rating and my greatest recommendation, five out of five.



    You might also be interested in:

    • I watched this for the first time last night. I absolutely loved it, but at one point I tweeted that there was a distinct possibility that Hopkins was genuinely batshit crazy. He really looks like he might be having just a little TOO good a time 😛 I agree that calling the sexuality of the film “controversial” is incorrect, but I’d like to add that Rossellini’s masochistic tendencies are an interesting element to her victimization. To write it off as exploitative is a waste. Great film and great review 🙂

    VIDEO

    TAGS

    Sponsors

    About Me

    Varied Celluloid is a film website intent on delivering views on movies from all genres. Started in 2003, the website has been steadfast in its goal and features a database of over 500 lengthy reviews. If you would like to contact us about writing for the website or sending screeners, please visit the about page located here.

    Twitter

      Photos